第1个回答 2006-12-04
Now, the sack use more and more are many, many people used one time to discard. Many plastic packing all with difficulty decompose, become the white pollution, the pollution environment.
Does this too wastes, with useless. Keeps the uselessness, hates to discard something, has wasted the resources in vain. Simultaneously the resident randomly loses also affects the city's appearance.
Food sack (for example Kentuckey, MacDonald and so on), although is the disposable paper carton, is unable to say for certain the health actually, also wastes extremely. The paper carton can waste the massive lumbers, similarly can have the very tremendous influence to the environment.
In order to earn the profit, works hard constantly on the sack, flatters own commodity, not necessarily is true actually, violates to consumer's rights and interests.
Plan: Outside available food (for example lotus leaf) package of food, ate inside to be possible to link also eats, if could not eat, then might throw in the recycling box which assigned, made the fertilizer or uses in other aspects.
第2个回答 2006-12-04
Now, the usage of the packing bag is more and more, many persons used to throw away once.Many plasticses pack all hard decomposition, becoming the white pollution, polluting environment.
Do like this too wasted, use good useless.Futility stay, leave it regrettable, the white white wasted a resources.Citizenry's confusion throws to also influence an urban landscape in the meantime.
The food packs bag(such as be willing to virtuous 基 , McDonald's etc.), although is a time of paper box, difficult protect to living, again very wasted.The paper box would wasted great deal of timber, the same will bring about very great influence on environment.
For earninging profits, contrive in packing bag persistently, aggrandize an own merchandise, but belong to not necessarily so actually, violate to the rights of the consumer.
Project:can wrap food with the food(such as lotus leaf), eat an inside can even the outside also eats up, if not edible, then can throw the appointed recovery box, make into fertilizer or used for other aspects.本回答被提问者采纳
第3个回答 2006-12-04
Now, more and more use of the package, with many people on a discarded.Many are biodegradable plastic packaging, as a white pollution, the environment. This too wasteful.no use of a good use. remain useless, wasteful and wasted resources. Meanwhile the public will be sent to account.Food package (such as Kentucky, McDonald's, etc.) is a one-off boxes, but no guarantee health,also very wasteful. Carton would waste a lot of wood, the same environment will have a huge impact.To earn a profit, trying to package their best efforts, lauded their own products, but not necessarily true.against the interests of consumers. Program : available food (lotus) packets of food to eat also inside the can even eat outside.If they can eat, they can be thrown into the designated recycling box, used to create fertilizers or in other areas.
第4个回答 2006-12-04
Now, the usage of the packing bag is more and more, many persons used to throw away once.Many plasticses pack all hard decomposition, becoming the white pollution, polluting environment.
Do like this too wasted, use good useless.Futility stay, leave it regrettable, the white white wasted a resources.Citizenry's confusion throws to also influence an urban landscape in the meantime.
The food packs bag (such as Kentucky, McDonald's, etc.) although is a time of paper box, difficult protect to living, again very wasted.The paper box would wasted great deal of timber, the same will bring about very great influence on environment.
For earninging profits, contrive in packing bag persistently, aggrandize an own merchandise, but belong to not necessarily so actually, violate to the rights of the consumer.
Project:can wrap food with the food(such as lotus leaf), eat an inside can even the outside also eats up, if not edible, then can throw the appointed recovery box, make into fertilizer or used for other aspects.